|
Congress passed the
Securities Act and the Exchange Act largely in response to the
manipulative practices of the early 20th century that lead to the stock
market crash. Congress passed these securities laws to stamp out
intentional or willful conduct designed to deceive or defraud investors
by controlling or artificially affecting the price of securities.
However, these crimes were not limited to deceitful practices. They
also covered the effecting of transactions to give the false impression
that certain market activity was occurring, when in fact such activity
was unrelated to actual demand.
With
the federal securities laws, however, Congress did not intend to
derogate the common law. The purpose of the statutes was to simply
borrow from the common law fraud theories in order to give a greater
degree of definiteness to the concept of manipulation and to supply an
enforcement and preventative mechanism.
The basic anti-fraud provisions, 17(a) of the Securities Act and
sections 10(b) and 15(c) of the Exchange Act, were passed to combat
certain of these manipulative practices. For instance, section 10(b),
which supplements section 9 of the Exchange Act, makes it unlawful to
use or employ any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance or
contravention of such rules and regulation as the SEC may prescribe as
necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection
of investors. Section 10(b) is generally known as the catchall
provision, which allows the SEC to deal with any new manipulative
practices.
Section
9 effectively criminalizes manipulative practices that give appearances
of bona fide transactions such as wash sales and pools. Section 9
(a)(2) offers the broadest prohibition against market manipulation by
making it unlawful for any person to affect a series of transactions in
any security registered on a national securities exchange in order to
create actual or apparent active trading in such a security, or raising
or depressing the price of such security for the purpose of inducing
the purchase or sale of such security by others.
Section
9(a)(2) is another catchall provision designed to prohibit devices used
to persuade the public that activity in a security is the reflection of
a genuine demand instead of a mirage. In essence, manipulation is a
form of deception because a person who purchases or sells securities
for the purpose of inducing other person to trade is necessarily
deceiving those persons into believing that the manipulator's purchases
or sales are a bona fide expression of supply and demand in the market.
Section
9(a)(4) also prohibits the use of false or misleading [statements] with
respect to any material fact, by brokers, dealers, or other persons in
order to induce others to purchase or sell securities. The practice of
spreading false rumors or bribing someone to hype a stock when a
broker, dealer or other offeror is trying to unload it has, as its only
objective, the goal of fueling investor enthusiasm. The practice of
bribing in such situations is also unlawful under a separate section,
9(a)(5).
However,
the section 9 provisions do not cover the manipulation of unregistered
securities. The only statutory basis for attacking over-the-counter
stocks are the general anti-fraud provisions of the Exchange Act,
together with section 17 of the Act. Nonetheless, the SEC has enforced
manipulation of unregistered stocks on the same level as registered
securities because, as the SEC concluded, there is no reasonable
distinction between manipulation of over-the-counter prices and
manipulation of prices on a national securities exchange.
|